We all know anime is better than Hollywood movies (okay, okay. some movies are good), but why is anime better? Actually, in all seriousness anime has advantages over the typical Hollywood movie.Let’s take a look at some of these advantages. I’ve touched on them before in various articles, but they are worth taking another look. Let’s start with Hollywood’s fetish for sequels.
Lately, we’ve been buried in sequels of sequels to the point where it seems as if Hollywood doesn’t have original ideas. Some of this is because of the high cost of marketing. Sequels are easier to market. Brands and characters are well known. Aside from marketing, sequels have a built-in audience, and this makes them less of a risk. After all, movies are expensive to make, and as a business, studios have to carefully balance profitability and storytelling. Not all stories will create profit. Anime shares these same concerns, and anime also suffers from sequelitis. However, anime still tends to take more risks than Hollywood films. That is why we often see off-the-wall stories like Dagashi Kashi with its focus on Japanese junk food. It helps that anime is generally less expensive to produce than Hollywood films. The lower cost allows studios to experiment more often because the bar for profitability is lower. Beyond cost, anime taps into manga as source material, and manga offers a diverse range of stories to pick from. Hollywood may be tapping into comic books for stories, but American comic books lack the diversity manga enjoys.
Tapping into comic books for stories helps and hurts. It helps because movies can tie into each other, but it hurts because story arcs lack definitive endings. Movies and television tend to milk stories until they shamble along as zombified shells of themselves. They lack definitive endings. While anime can do the same–ehem One Piece–most anime stories have definitive endings. They have a story to tell in a certain number of episodes and that’s it. Hollywood has used the same mechanism in the past. For example, the Lord of the Rings movie series set out to cover each book within a single movie. They had 3 movies to tell the story. Recent superhero films, however, reboot and stutter over the same story threads. Look at how many times Batman has been rebooted. Anime has more in common with Lord of the Rings than Batman’s constant reboots. Most anime never sees a reboot. Most anime ends after a certain number of episodes, even if that number happens to be in the 300s. When the story ends, it ends.
These set lengths and definitive endings allow some anime stories to be superior to Hollywood and television stories. Knowing you only have 52 episodes to tell a story keeps writers from padding. Yes, Bleach and Dragonball Z, and other anime are stuffed with filler, but that actually supports my argument. It is better to have a set number of movies or episodes. This gives writers a goal to aim toward when adapting a manga series, which gives the series better cohesion and pacing. Padding and filler kills tension. Sometimes. an anime benefits from reordering a manga series as well–which can only be done with set episodes. Manga and anime have the nasty habit of killing tension and suspense with an ill-timed flashback, something Hollywood rarely does nowadays.
I spoke about the expense of movies keeping Hollywood from taking risks. Much of that expense come from CGI. Live action has limitations that only CGI can get around. Animation, on the other hand, doesn’t have real-world limitations. You can draw and animate anything you want. Animation allows the audience to believe in things like giant robots more readily than live-action. And this is why CGI budgets drive up the cost of movie-making. The suspension of disbelief is harder for CGI to achieve because we know what real-world objects look like, so CGI must look perfect; otherwise, we can be jarred out of our film experience. Because of this, animation is better suited for some types of stories more than others. Sadly, American audiences still equate animation with children or with comedy. So it will be a while before American animation studios tackle the same adult themes and stories anime has tackled for decades.
Don’t get me wrong. I enjoy movies. I relish settling in for an evening of classic films from Hollywood’s golden era. But sadly that era has passed. While Hollywood occasionally cranks out a movie in the same pedigree as Raisin in the Sun or San Francisco (I adore movies from the 1930s-1950s), these are rarer than they should be. I also don’t wear blinders when it comes to anime. Anime struggles with drivel as much as American television. Perhaps even more so with all the harem stories and fan-service ladened garbage out there. However, anime retains the strengths the golden age of Hollywood enjoyed: bold, experimental stories, set length series, and a reliance on storytelling rather than special effects. In fact, special effects could be one of the chief factors behind Hollywood’s decline in storytelling. Audiences want to be wowed and stimulated rather than lost in dialogue and personalities. Movies try to fit in more explosions and increasingly intense action sequences to keep a jaded audience interested. And this makes budgets balloon. On the other hand, anime can ratchet up the action with less of a hit to the budget and without hurting storytelling as much. Animation lets your take liberties live-action simply can’t–such as pausing an explosion for some expository dialogue. Live-action movies that use CGI to do this come off as jarring and unrealistic. Although, I have to say anime really shouldn’t do that; the point is, it can.
In the end, it comes down to profit. Hollywood will make movies people want to see. Anime studios do the same. The best way to change trends we dislike is to vote with our wallets. Tired of superhero movies? Stop going to see them in theaters and buying their DVDs. Tired of high-school anime? Stop watching them and buying their DVDs. Instead, use your money to vote for stories you want to see. Go out and watch the rare original Hollywood film. Buy that set of Moribito DVDs. In the end, we consumers decide. Hollywood’s weaknesses are our decision. Likewise we decide Hollywood’s –and anime’s–strengths.
A counter to your first argument, did you ever hear about movies based on actual books rather than comic books? Books can be as diverse as manga and still touch some subjects which manga might not be able to, after all, we have movies and books based on drug mafia and cartels, where are they in anime? Where are they in manga? Nowehere.
The variety in books is much more when compared to just manga because manga is just based in Japan, books are written all over the world and offer an outlook into different cultures and different story types. Don’t be a completely anime biased fan and think about it, the number of geniuses born all over the world are more than the number of geniuses born in just Japan, so since we got that out of the way, we will talk about your next arguments.
And reboots, anime does do quite a lot of reboots my dear friend, you are only talking about the reboots within the superhero genre. Classics like the Godfather weren’t remade, were they? And movies, books don’t suffer with something like filler or hiatus.
Now, let’s talk about your next argument. Ever heard of something called, “TV Series”? That’s where TV Series come in, I’d rather prefer to watch a well researched logical, relatable drama rather than watching with something with tons of fillers, and filler doesn’t kill tension, rather it kills the “interest” we have in anime. Most of the people always skip the fillers in anime, and even I do, who is going to watch fillers when they can skip it unless they’re watching a show which is airing.
Your next argument, have you seen “The Godfather 2” my friend? I am sure you didn’t, killing tension? Non Linear Screenplay? Engaging timing? Hollywood does that damn well, you haven’t seen the movies that do, you’re just talking about the ones that don’t, likewise, not all anime are good, out of all 20,000 anime on MyAnimeList, not 200+ anime are rated over 8.
Now let’s talk about your next argument, yes “CGI”, anime does have an upper hand here, but I will also present an argument here. Would you feel more empathy towards an emotional scene watching a 2d character or would you feel more empathy towards a character enacted by actual human? Something that is imaginary or something that is presented in a real humane way. If anime has it’s ups, so does Hollywood.
Now, the next argument, please don’t talk about the golden era of anime then. You are only talking about a certain period of Hollywood cinema while you’ve taken the liberty to take old anime like DBZ as examples, which is basically wrong. If you’re going to take and compare anime industry as a whole, compare it to Hollywood as a whole. You say anime has more experimental stories, the history and the age of Hollywood is much more than that of anime and there have been quite a lot of experimental films come out in Hollywood. Hollywood in all it’s time, has taken many more risks than anime and has produced and has done more experimental films, the sheer history of Hollywood proves that fact.
And as you said it comes down to profit, in terms of numbers Hollywood has lost more than anime but also in terms of numbers Hollywood has gained much more than anime.
So I’d like to conclude by saying that Hollywood is better than anime, I am a person who has watched a lot of movies as well as anime and those are my arguments. Thank you
Thanks for explaining your viewpoint.
Actually, when it comes to characters, I am more engaged by a well-done animated character than some actor or actress I’ve seen in many films. When I watch a Spencer Tracy film, I see Spencer Tracy, not the character he plays. Toshiro Mifune is Mifune no matter the character he plays. Whereas, animated characters don’t have that problem (usually) because a well-done design won’t reappear in an unrelated story.
I don’t consider Hollywood or Japanese anime studios as superior to each other. Live-action tells some stories better than animation. Animation tells some stories better than live-action. When I wrote the article, I was burned out on all the sequels and remakes Hollywood was producing. I would love to see the majority of movies released in a year to be based on books or original stories instead of reboots, sequels, and rehashes.
I hope these otaku’s should learn from this…they keep bashing hollywood for no reason
All types of storytelling have a place. I’m glad we have so many different types, although I am partial to books :D.
I think you have done a very less research about anime and bollywood. I agree at few point of yours but still that phrase when you say that the Hollywood’s real life or realistic humane is more effective that the emotional scenes of anime, you are simply wrong. I am not saying it like that only I’m saying because emotional attachment is more in anime because of character developments which Hollywood clearly lacks. And as you say that Hollywood is making more money and fans than anime, I just wanna say the time will come when everybody will know anime and respects it.
And yes I’m a Anime fan